It’s ridiculous how many projects are all doing essentially the same thing, but each of them periodically go through this existential crisis. Everyone and their dog has some derivative desktop email client out there with a handful of devs or less and no real entity behind it to ensure a long term commitment. The biggest drawback though is the lack of commitment. It seems like it has all the worst habits of Firefox and interface functionality and styling that has always felt bulky or something to me. Unfortunately the Mozilla mail codebase, neglected or under-developed over the years, doesn’t do it for me. Nothing has ever come close to Eudora 7 for me. I’d love a decent desktop email client again. Maybe a new maintainer might fix that.īut without a portable version, I can’t consider it. I would recommend it to anyone over TB if privacy above and beyond that which can be provided by the OS is not an issue. Also for the cloud, an encrypted self-extracting zip file with the container and the portable version of the container app.Īfter a long run with Pale Moon, I went to Cyberfox a few years ago but I did consider FossaMail and ran it on a test system for a while.įM is an excellent client. In the long run, this method became most convenient for backup: the container daily to a USB stick, stored in a fireproof safe, and the NAS. Several years ago I began to run Haller’s portable version in a TrueCrypt (now another one) container. And the primary reason I stopped donating.Īs well, an extension to that end is unacceptable for all the obvious reasons. The lack of an embedded encryption scheme is beyond reasoning and requests for such have fallen first on deaf ears then the dearth of development energy. and online commerce became a default in those landscapes, far too much critical data was stored in that wide-open profile folder. I’ve been using TB since 2004, v0.6 I think, when my email needs were far more casual than today.Īs “paperless” interaction with finance, insurance, health care, etc. Another option is keeping it alive but doing only what is absolutely necessary, but that is probably the last desirable outcome for the current maintainer of the project. Since Moonchild cannot give FossaMail the attention the project deserves anymore, it could very well mean the end of the project. It is unclear what is going to happen if no new maintainer is found. Moonchild notes that there is no requirement to keep on using Pale Moon's backend for the messaging program. One interesting tidbit of the decision is that the new maintainer may select a different codebase for FossaMail.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |